https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue Search results sv The Household Market and Nonmarket Activities (HUS) project started as a joint research project between the Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI) and Göteborg University in 1980. The ambition was to build a consistent longitudinal micro data base on the use of time, money and public services of households. The first main survey was carried out in 1984. In addition to a contact interview with the selected individuals, all designated individuals participated in a personal interview and two telephone interviews. All respondents were asked about their family background, education, marital status, labor market experience, and employment. In addition, questions about the household were asked of the head of household, concerning family composition, child care, health status, housing, possession of vacation homes, cars, boats and other consumption durables. At the end of the personal interview the household head had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about financing of current home, construction costs for building a house, house value and loans, imputation of property values and loans, additions/renovations 1983, maintenance and repairs, leasing, sale of previous home, assets and liabilities, and non-taxable benefits. All the respondents had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about tax-return information 1983, employment income, and taxes and support payments. Two telephone interviews were used primarily to collect data on the household´s time use and consumption expenditures. The 1986 HUS-survey included both a follow-up of the 1984 sample (panel study) and a supplementary sample. The 1986 sample included 1) all respondents participating in the 1984 survey, 2) the household heads, partners and third persons who should have participated in 1984 but did not (1984 nonresponse), 3) those individuals who started living together after the 1984 interview with an selected individual who participated or was supposed to participate in 1984, 4) members of the 1984 household born in 1966 or 1967. If entering a new household, for example because of leaving their parental home, the household head and his/her partner were also interviewed. Respondents participating in the 1984 survey were interviewed by telephone in 1986. Questions dealt with changes in family composition, housing, employment, wages and child care, and it was not only recorded whether a change had occurred, and what sort of change, but also when it occurred. The respondents also received a questionnaire by mail with questions mainly concerning income and assets. Respondents not participating in the earlier survey were interviewed in person and were asked approximately the same questions as in the 1984 personal interview. The 1988 HUS-survey was considerably smaller than the previous ones. It was addressed exclusively to participants in the 1986 survey, and consisted of a self-enumerated questionnaire with a nonrespondent follow-up by telephone. The questions dealt with changes in housing conditions, employment and household composition. The questionnaire also contained some questions on household income. In many respect the 1991 HUS-survey replicated the 1988 survey. The questions were basically the same in content and range, and the survey was conducted as a self-enamurated questionnaire sent out by mail. This time, however, in contrast to the 1988 survey, an attempt was made to include in the survey the new household members who had moved into sample households since 1986, as well as young people who turned 18 after the 1986 survey. Earlier respondents received a questionnaire by mail containing questions about their home, their primary occupation and weekly work hours since May 1988 (event-history data), earnings in 1989, 1990 and 1991, household composition and any changes in it that might have occurred since 1988, child care and some questions on income. New respondents were also asked about their education and labor-market experience. With respect to its design and question wording, the 1993 survey is a new version of the 1986 survey. The survey is made up of four parts: 1) the panel survey, which was addressed mainly to respondents in the 1991 survey, with certain additions; 2) the so-called supplementary survey, which focused on a new random sample of individuals; 3) the so-called nonresponse survey, which encompassed respondents who had participated in at least one of the earlier surveys but had since dropped out; 4) the time-use survey, which included the same sample of respondents as those in the panel and supplementary surveys. Individuals in the nonresponse group were not included in the time-use survey. Most of the questions in the first three surveys were the same, but certain questions sequences were targeted to the respondents in a specific survey. Thus certain retrospective questions were asked of the nonresponse group, while specific questions on social background, labor market experience etc. were addressed to new respondents. In the case of respondents who had already participated in the panel, a combined contact and main interview was conducted by telephone, after which a self-enumerated questionnaire was sent out to each respondent by mail. The panel sample also included young people in panel households who were born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members who had not previously been interviewed. These individuals, like new respondents, were not interviewed by telephone until they had been interviewed personally. Thus technically they were treated in the same manner as individuals in the supplementary sample. The new supplementary sample was first contacted by telephone and then given a fairly lengthy personal interview, at the conclusion of which each respondent was asked to fill out a written questionnaire. In this respect the survey design for the nonresponse sample was the same as for the supplementary sample. The nonresponse sample also included young people born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members. The time-use interviews were conducted by telephone. For each respondent two days were chosen at random from the period from February 15, 1993 to February 14, 1994 and the respondents were interviewed about their time use during those two days. If possible, the time-use interviews were preceded by the other parts of the survey, but this was not always feasible. In each household the household head and spouse/partner were interviewed, as well as an additional person in certain households. Questions regarding the household as a whole were asked of only one person in the household, preferably the household head. As in earlier surveys, data from the interviews was subsequently supplemented by registry data, but only for those respondents who had given their express consent. There is registry information for 75-80 percent of the sample. The telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; and cars and boats. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1992. The 1996 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and environment. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1995. The 1998 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and municipal service. The questionnaire was divided into nine sections: sale of previous home; house value and loans; insurance; home-related expenses; assets; household income; inheritances and gifts; black-market work; and respondent income 1997. Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:00:00 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0277-24 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0277-24 Göteborgs universitet Anders Klevmarken Lennart Flood The Household Market and Nonmarket Activities (HUS) project started as a joint research project between the Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI) and Göteborg University in 1980. The ambition was to build a consistent longitudinal micro data base on the use of time, money and public services of households. The first main survey was carried out in 1984. In addition to a contact interview with the selected individuals, all designated individuals participated in a personal interview and two telephone interviews. All respondents were asked about their family background, education, marital status, labor market experience, and employment. In addition, questions about the household were asked of the head of household, concerning family composition, child care, health status, housing, possession of vacation homes, cars, boats and other consumption durables. At the end of the personal interview the household head had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about financing of current home, construction costs for building a house, house value and loans, imputation of property values and loans, additions/renovations 1983, maintenance and repairs, leasing, sale of previous home, assets and liabilities, and non-taxable benefits. All the respondents had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about tax-return information 1983, employment income, and taxes and support payments. Two telephone interviews were used primarily to collect data on the household´s time use and consumption expenditures. The 1986 HUS-survey included both a follow-up of the 1984 sample (panel study) and a supplementary sample. The 1986 sample included 1) all respondents participating in the 1984 survey, 2) the household heads, partners and third persons who should have participated in 1984 but did not (1984 nonresponse), 3) those individuals who started living together after the 1984 interview with an selected individual who participated or was supposed to participate in 1984, 4) members of the 1984 household born in 1966 or 1967. If entering a new household, for example because of leaving their parental home, the household head and his/her partner were also interviewed. Respondents participating in the 1984 survey were interviewed by telephone in 1986. Questions dealt with changes in family composition, housing, employment, wages and child care, and it was not only recorded whether a change had occurred, and what sort of change, but also when it occurred. The respondents also received a questionnaire by mail with questions mainly concerning income and assets. Respondents not participating in the earlier survey were interviewed in person and were asked approximately the same questions as in the 1984 personal interview. The 1988 HUS-survey was considerably smaller than the previous ones. It was addressed exclusively to participants in the 1986 survey, and consisted of a self-enumerated questionnaire with a nonrespondent follow-up by telephone. The questions dealt with changes in housing conditions, employment and household composition. The questionnaire also contained some questions on household income. In many respect the 1991 HUS-survey replicated the 1988 survey. The questions were basically the same in content and range, and the survey was conducted as a self-enamurated questionnaire sent out by mail. This time, however, in contrast to the 1988 survey, an attempt was made to include in the survey the new household members who had moved into sample households since 1986, as well as young people who turned 18 after the 1986 survey. Earlier respondents received a questionnaire by mail containing questions about their home, their primary occupation and weekly work hours since May 1988 (event-history data), earnings in 1989, 1990 and 1991, household composition and any changes in it that might have occurred since 1988, child care and some questions on income. New respondents were also asked about their education and labor-market experience. With respect to its design and question wording, the 1993 survey is a new version of the 1986 survey. The survey is made up of four parts: 1) the panel survey, which was addressed mainly to respondents in the 1991 survey, with certain additions; 2) the so-called supplementary survey, which focused on a new random sample of individuals; 3) the so-called nonresponse survey, which encompassed respondents who had participated in at least one of the earlier surveys but had since dropped out; 4) the time-use survey, which included the same sample of respondents as those in the panel and supplementary surveys. Individuals in the nonresponse group were not included in the time-use survey. Most of the questions in the first three surveys were the same, but certain questions sequences were targeted to the respondents in a specific survey. Thus certain retrospective questions were asked of the nonresponse group, while specific questions on social background, labor market experience etc. were addressed to new respondents. In the case of respondents who had already participated in the panel, a combined contact and main interview was conducted by telephone, after which a self-enumerated questionnaire was sent out to each respondent by mail. The panel sample also included young people in panel households who were born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members who had not previously been interviewed. These individuals, like new respondents, were not interviewed by telephone until they had been interviewed personally. Thus technically they were treated in the same manner as individuals in the supplementary sample. The new supplementary sample was first contacted by telephone and then given a fairly lengthy personal interview, at the conclusion of which each respondent was asked to fill out a written questionnaire. In this respect the survey design for the nonresponse sample was the same as for the supplementary sample. The nonresponse sample also included young people born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members. The time-use interviews were conducted by telephone. For each respondent two days were chosen at random from the period from February 15, 1993 to February 14, 1994 and the respondents were interviewed about their time use during those two days. If possible, the time-use interviews were preceded by the other parts of the survey, but this was not always feasible. In each household the household head and spouse/partner were interviewed, as well as an additional person in certain households. Questions regarding the household as a whole were asked of only one person in the household, preferably the household head. As in earlier surveys, data from the interviews was subsequently supplemented by registry data, but only for those respondents who had given their express consent. There is registry information for 75-80 percent of the sample. The telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; and cars and boats. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1992. The 1996 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and environment. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1995. The 1998 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and municipal service. The questionnaire was divided into nine sections: sale of previous home; house value and loans; insurance; home-related expenses; assets; household income; inheritances and gifts; black-market work; and respondent income 1997. Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:00:00 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0277-23 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0277-23 Göteborgs universitet Anders Klevmarken Lennart Flood The Household Market and Nonmarket Activities (HUS) project started as a joint research project between the Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research (IUI) and Göteborg University in 1980. The ambition was to build a consistent longitudinal micro data base on the use of time, money and public services of households. The first main survey was carried out in 1984. In addition to a contact interview with the selected individuals, all designated individuals participated in a personal interview and two telephone interviews. All respondents were asked about their family background, education, marital status, labor market experience, and employment. In addition, questions about the household were asked of the head of household, concerning family composition, child care, health status, housing, possession of vacation homes, cars, boats and other consumption durables. At the end of the personal interview the household head had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about financing of current home, construction costs for building a house, house value and loans, imputation of property values and loans, additions/renovations 1983, maintenance and repairs, leasing, sale of previous home, assets and liabilities, and non-taxable benefits. All the respondents had to fill out a questionnaire including questions about tax-return information 1983, employment income, and taxes and support payments. Two telephone interviews were used primarily to collect data on the household´s time use and consumption expenditures. The 1986 HUS-survey included both a follow-up of the 1984 sample (panel study) and a supplementary sample. The 1986 sample included 1) all respondents participating in the 1984 survey, 2) the household heads, partners and third persons who should have participated in 1984 but did not (1984 nonresponse), 3) those individuals who started living together after the 1984 interview with an selected individual who participated or was supposed to participate in 1984, 4) members of the 1984 household born in 1966 or 1967. If entering a new household, for example because of leaving their parental home, the household head and his/her partner were also interviewed. Respondents participating in the 1984 survey were interviewed by telephone in 1986. Questions dealt with changes in family composition, housing, employment, wages and child care, and it was not only recorded whether a change had occurred, and what sort of change, but also when it occurred. The respondents also received a questionnaire by mail with questions mainly concerning income and assets. Respondents not participating in the earlier survey were interviewed in person and were asked approximately the same questions as in the 1984 personal interview. The 1988 HUS-survey was considerably smaller than the previous ones. It was addressed exclusively to participants in the 1986 survey, and consisted of a self-enumerated questionnaire with a nonrespondent follow-up by telephone. The questions dealt with changes in housing conditions, employment and household composition. The questionnaire also contained some questions on household income. In many respect the 1991 HUS-survey replicated the 1988 survey. The questions were basically the same in content and range, and the survey was conducted as a self-enamurated questionnaire sent out by mail. This time, however, in contrast to the 1988 survey, an attempt was made to include in the survey the new household members who had moved into sample households since 1986, as well as young people who turned 18 after the 1986 survey. Earlier respondents received a questionnaire by mail containing questions about their home, their primary occupation and weekly work hours since May 1988 (event-history data), earnings in 1989, 1990 and 1991, household composition and any changes in it that might have occurred since 1988, child care and some questions on income. New respondents were also asked about their education and labor-market experience. With respect to its design and question wording, the 1993 survey is a new version of the 1986 survey. The survey is made up of four parts: 1) the panel survey, which was addressed mainly to respondents in the 1991 survey, with certain additions; 2) the so-called supplementary survey, which focused on a new random sample of individuals; 3) the so-called nonresponse survey, which encompassed respondents who had participated in at least one of the earlier surveys but had since dropped out; 4) the time-use survey, which included the same sample of respondents as those in the panel and supplementary surveys. Individuals in the nonresponse group were not included in the time-use survey. Most of the questions in the first three surveys were the same, but certain questions sequences were targeted to the respondents in a specific survey. Thus certain retrospective questions were asked of the nonresponse group, while specific questions on social background, labor market experience etc. were addressed to new respondents. In the case of respondents who had already participated in the panel, a combined contact and main interview was conducted by telephone, after which a self-enumerated questionnaire was sent out to each respondent by mail. The panel sample also included young people in panel households who were born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members who had not previously been interviewed. These individuals, like new respondents, were not interviewed by telephone until they had been interviewed personally. Thus technically they were treated in the same manner as individuals in the supplementary sample. The new supplementary sample was first contacted by telephone and then given a fairly lengthy personal interview, at the conclusion of which each respondent was asked to fill out a written questionnaire. In this respect the survey design for the nonresponse sample was the same as for the supplementary sample. The nonresponse sample also included young people born in 1973 or 1974 as well as certain new household members. The time-use interviews were conducted by telephone. For each respondent two days were chosen at random from the period from February 15, 1993 to February 14, 1994 and the respondents were interviewed about their time use during those two days. If possible, the time-use interviews were preceded by the other parts of the survey, but this was not always feasible. In each household the household head and spouse/partner were interviewed, as well as an additional person in certain households. Questions regarding the household as a whole were asked of only one person in the household, preferably the household head. As in earlier surveys, data from the interviews was subsequently supplemented by registry data, but only for those respondents who had given their express consent. There is registry information for 75-80 percent of the sample. The telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; and cars and boats. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1992. The 1996 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and environment. The questionnaire was divided into twelve sections: sale of previous home; acquisition of current home; construction costs for building a home; house value and loans; repairs; insurance; home-related expenses; sale of previous home; assets; household income; taxes; and respondent income 1995. The 1998 telephone interview is divided into following sections: administrative data; labor market experience; employment; job-seekers; not in labor force; education; family composition; child care; health status; other household members; housing conditions; vacation homes; cars and boats; and municipal service. The questionnaire was divided into nine sections: sale of previous home; house value and loans; insurance; home-related expenses; assets; household income; inheritances and gifts; black-market work; and respondent income 1997. Fri, 02 Feb 1996 00:00:00 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0277-25 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0277-25 Göteborgs universitet Anders Klevmarken Lennart Flood Ett instrument, "Anhörigas Delaktighet i Vårdandet" med två delskalor: Kommunikation och Tillit; och Samarbete i Vårdandet, jämförs inom grupper (kontroll och interventionsgrupp) före och efter en utbildningsintervention. Jämförelser görs av dels råpoäng men även av linjära poäng. Signifikans på individuell person-nivå ges. Projektet implementerade en utbildningsintervention på 30 särskilda boenden. Interventionen riktade sig till personalen och bestod av fem 2-timmars seminarier med fokus på kunskap och färdigheter nödvändiga för en evidensbaserad praktik. Innehållet baserades på fundamentala principer för palliativ vård. Ämnena som togs upp vid varje seminarier var: 1) palliativ ansats och värdig vård; 2) närstående till äldre personer i särskilt boende; 3) existens och döende; 4) symtomlindring; 5) samverkan i vårdandet. SPSS datafil med kön, ålder, kontroll/interventionsgrupp, råpoäng på en totalskala (NoK-PiC) samt för subskalorna (CaT och CiC) före och efter utbildningsintervention. I filen finns även omräkning till linjariserade poäng med standardfel, samt beräkning av individuell person-nivås signifikans. Tomma celler innebär att frågorna ej är besvarade Wed, 16 Dec 2020 10:46:25 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/2020-180-1 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/2020-180-1 Högskolan Kristianstad Albert Westergren "Äldre personer i riskzonen" är en hälsofrämjande och förebyggande interventionsstudie. Avsikten var att studiegruppen skulle omfatta ett representativt urval av "pre-sköra" 80-åringar boende i sina egna hem inom två stadsdelar i Göteborg. Kriterierna var att deltagarna skulle leva i sitt ordinarie boende och inte vara beroende av kommunal hemtjänst eller vård. Vidare skulle de vara oberoende av hjälp från någon annan person i de dagliga aktiviteterna samt inte ha kognitiva nedsättningar, med ett resultat på 25 eller högre enligt bedömning med Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). Deltagarna randomiserades till tre studiegrupper: två interventionsgrupper och en kontrollgrupp - Intervention A; Seniora möten och uppföljande hembesök - Intervention B; Förebyggande hembesök - Kontrollgrupp Totalt ingick 459 personer i studien, varav 171 personer i intervention A, 174 personer i intervention B och 114 personer i kontrollgruppen. Alla deltagare fick ett första besök som bestod av en intervju, bedömning och observation. Första besöket, d.v.s baslinjeintervjun, genomfördes i deltagarens hem av forskningsassistenter som var utbildade att intervjua, bedöma och observera enligt riktlinjerna för de olika utfallsmåtten. Uppföljande datainsamlingar genomfördes i alla grupper vid 3 månader, 1 år och 2 år efter intervention, och skedde också i deltagarens hem av välutbildade forskarassistenter. Syfte: Interventionsstudien syftade till att bevisa följande två hypoteser: 1) Om det är möjligt att förhindra/fördröja en försämring hos äldre om en intervention genomförs när de inte är så svaga; 2) Om en flerdimensionell och multiprofessionell intervention är effektivare än enbart förebyggande hembesök. Datasetet innefattar deltagarna i de två interventionsgrupperna samt kontrollgruppen, totalt 459 personer. Interventionens baslinjemätning genomfördes mellan januari 2008 och december 2010 och därefter skedde uppföljning vid 3 månader, 1 år och efter 2 år. Thu, 11 Dec 2014 19:59:51 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/ext0135-1 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/ext0135-1 Göteborgs universitet Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff En longitudinell studie med ett urval av ursprungligen 800 personer i åldern 25-54 år, som 1992 var arbetslösa och sökte arbete via arbetsförmedlingen. Den första intervjuomgången genomfördes 1992, den andra 1993, och en tredje uppföljningsintervju genomfördes under 2001. Undersökningen berör följande områden: Uppväxtförhållanden; Familj och flyttning; Bostadsförhållanden; Utbildning; Fysisk och psykisk hälsa; Sysselsättning vid intervjutillfället, bl.a. AMU och eventuellt tillfälligt arbete; Sökprocessen, bland annat kontakter med arbetsförmedlingen och med arbetsgivare samt informationsvägar i sökprocessen; Strukturering och användning av tid under arbetslösheten; Ekonomisk ersättning via A-kassa och KAS samt ekonomiska resurser och problem; Upplevelse av arbetslöshet och framtidsutsikter; Sysselsättningsbiografi sedan det första arbetet på minst sex månader; Anställnings- och arbetsplatsförhållanden i det senaste arbetet; Utlösande orsak till arbetslöshet; Deltagande i hushållsarbete; Säkerhet till liv och egendom; Fritidsaktiviteter; Politiskt och fackligt deltagande, samt klassmedvetande; Orientering till arbete, 'känsla av sammanhang' (Antonowsky) och bedömning av livssituation. Fri, 17 Oct 2014 00:00:00 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0794-1 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0794-1 Stockholms universitet Sten-Åke Stenberg En longitudinell studie med ett urval av ursprungligen 800 personer i åldern 25-54 år, som 1992 var arbetslösa och sökte arbete via arbetsförmedlingen. Den första intervjuomgången genomfördes 1992, den andra 1993, och en tredje uppföljningsintervju genomfördes under 2001. Undersökningen berör följande områden: Uppväxtförhållanden; Familj och flyttning; Bostadsförhållanden; Utbildning; Fysisk och psykisk hälsa; Sysselsättning vid intervjutillfället, bl.a. AMU och eventuellt tillfälligt arbete; Sökprocessen, bland annat kontakter med arbetsförmedlingen och med arbetsgivare samt informationsvägar i sökprocessen; Strukturering och användning av tid under arbetslösheten; Ekonomisk ersättning via A-kassa och KAS samt ekonomiska resurser och problem; Upplevelse av arbetslöshet och framtidsutsikter; Sysselsättningsbiografi sedan det första arbetet på minst sex månader; Anställnings- och arbetsplatsförhållanden i det senaste arbetet; Utlösande orsak till arbetslöshet; Deltagande i hushållsarbete; Säkerhet till liv och egendom; Fritidsaktiviteter; Politiskt och fackligt deltagande, samt klassmedvetande; Orientering till arbete, 'känsla av sammanhang' (Antonowsky) och bedömning av livssituation. Mon, 20 Oct 2014 00:00:00 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0794-2 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0794-2 Stockholms universitet Sten-Åke Stenberg En longitudinell studie med ett urval av ursprungligen 800 personer i åldern 25-54 år, som 1992 var arbetslösa och sökte arbete via arbetsförmedlingen. Den första intervjuomgången genomfördes 1992, den andra 1993, och en tredje uppföljningsintervju genomfördes under 2001. Undersökningen berör följande områden: Uppväxtförhållanden; Familj och flyttning; Bostadsförhållanden; Utbildning; Fysisk och psykisk hälsa; Sysselsättning vid intervjutillfället, bl.a. AMU och eventuellt tillfälligt arbete; Sökprocessen, bland annat kontakter med arbetsförmedlingen och med arbetsgivare samt informationsvägar i sökprocessen; Strukturering och användning av tid under arbetslösheten; Ekonomisk ersättning via A-kassa och KAS samt ekonomiska resurser och problem; Upplevelse av arbetslöshet och framtidsutsikter; Sysselsättningsbiografi sedan det första arbetet på minst sex månader; Anställnings- och arbetsplatsförhållanden i det senaste arbetet; Utlösande orsak till arbetslöshet; Deltagande i hushållsarbete; Säkerhet till liv och egendom; Fritidsaktiviteter; Politiskt och fackligt deltagande, samt klassmedvetande; Orientering till arbete, 'känsla av sammanhang' (Antonowsky) och bedömning av livssituation. Tue, 21 Oct 2014 00:00:00 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0794-3 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/snd0794-3 Stockholms universitet Sten-Åke Stenberg Syftet med forskningen var att: I) jämföra förlossningsläkares och gynekologers personlighetsdrag med den allmänna befolkningen och II) undersöka sambandet mellan förlossningsläkares och gynekologers personlighetsdrag, kognitiv förmåga, klinisk erfarenhet, kön och tre beslutsfattandestilar (Individuell, Team och Flow) i akuta förlossningssituationer. Data består av svaren (n = 472, motsvarande 22 % svarsfrekvens) på en webbenkät som skickades ut till förlossningsläkare och gynekologer, medlemmar i Svenska Föreningen för Obstetrik & Gynekologi. Undersökningen inkluderade en förenklad version av femfaktormodellen (IPIP-NEO-30), ett rymdsuppfattningstest (ICAR) och 15 allmänna frågor om beslutsfattande i akuta förlossningssituationer relaterade till tre beslutsstilar (Individuell, Team och Flow). Datauppsättningen består av svaren (n = 472) på frågorna i det bifogade frågeformuläret: "items" 1 till 24. Likertskalan användes för de flesta frågorna, några andra hade ett ja eller nej typ av svar eller flerval, och några få hade ett fält för fritext. Svaren på fråga 3, angående arbetsplats, och fritextsvaren på fråga 11, angående 'motivering av preferens', har tagits bort för att säkerställa strikt anonymitet och undvika risk för bakvägsidentifiering. Den specifika åldern för respondenter 70 år eller äldre har också kodats för att undvika risk för bakvägsidentifiering, eftersom dessa individer i allmänhet är ganska få på arbetsplatsen. För åtkomst till data gällande specifik ålder för individer 70 år eller äldre, kontakta ansvarig forskare. Tue, 03 Oct 2023 14:00:54 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/2022-57-1 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/2022-57-1 Lunds universitet Gabriel Raoust Dessa data avser främst den vetenskapliga artikeln "Viral infection changes the expression of personality traits in an insect species reared for consumption". Här undersöker vi beteendeegenskaperna hos både infekterade och friska syrsor och relaterar skillnader i dessa egenskaper till en förståelse av insektspersonligheter inom ett djurproduktionssystem. Se engelsk beskrivning för närmare information. För en fullständig beskrivning av data, se den engelska versionen Wed, 06 Jul 2022 08:48:19 GMT https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/2022-30-1 https://researchdata.se/sv/catalogue/dataset/2022-30-1 Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet Matthew Low