Capability ranking among health care related researchers and students at 5 Swedish universities
https://doi.org/10.5878/r2nm-zc35
The capability approach by Amartya Sen (Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel, 1998) measures quality of life in terms of capabilities; i.e. what individuals can do or be, as opposed to measuring quality of life in terms of wealth or happiness.
Practical considerations limit the number of capabilities that can be taken into account, and what capabilities are most relevant for quality of life may differ between contexts. For example, access to drinking-water is taken for granted by most people in Sweden in contrast to other countries that have areas that suffer from water shortage.
The purpose of the study was to collect information on what capabilities are perceived as important in the Swedish context. The starting point were the following 10 capabilities from a Swedish governmental investigation in 2015 : Time, Financial situation, Health, Political resources, Knowledge, Living environment, Occupation, Social relations, Security, and Housing.
The data was collected with a cross-sectional web based survey among health care related researchers and students at 5 Swedish universities who ranked the 10 capabilities. The data consists of 10 unique ranks assigned to each capability per participant and information on research area, gender, and age group of participants.
Documentation files
Documentation files
Citation and access
Citation and access
Data access level:
Creator/Principal investigator(s):
Research principal:
Data contains personal data:
No
Citation:
Language:
Method and outcome
Method and outcome
Unit of analysis:
Population:
Researchers and students in health related subjects from 5 Swedish universities
Time method:
Sampling procedure:
Description of sampling:
The study population consisted of a convenience sample of Swedish speaking researchers and doctoral student at 5 Swedish universities, totaling in about 830 potential participatants:
- about 100 from the Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet
- about 440 from the Medical Faculty at Lund University
- about 40 from the Unit of Epidemiology and Global Health at Umeå University
- about 180 from the Department of Women’s and Children’s Health and the Department of Public Health and Care Science at Uppsala University
- about 70 from the University Health Care Research Center at Region Örebro County.
171 replied, but 4 did not explicitly give consent to participate. This resulted in a response rate of about 20% (167/830).
We sent an email invitation with information and a link to the web survey on May 28 2016, followed by a reminder on June 15 2016.
Time period(s) investigated:
Variables:
17
Number of individuals/objects:
167
Response rate/participation rate:
20%
Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
Mode of collection:
Self-administered questionnaire: Web-based (CAWI)
Time period(s) for data collection:
2016-05-28 - 2016-06-20
Source of the data:
- Research data
- Research data: Unpublished
Geographic coverage
Geographic coverage
Administrative information
Administrative information
Responsible department/unit:
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
Contributor(s):
- Inna Feldman – Uppsala University - Department of Public Health and Caring Science
- Björn Ekmann – Lund University - Department of Clinical Sciences
- Anna-Karin Hurtig – Umeå university - Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
- Lars Hagberg – Örebro University - University Health Care Research Center
Funding
Funding
Funding agency:
Award number:
2014-145 and 2018-00143
Topic and keywords
Topic and keywords
Swedish Standard Classification of Research Subjects 2025:
Publications
Publications
Citation:
Månsdotter, A., Ekman, B., Meili, K. W., Feldman, I., Hagberg, L., Hurtig, A.-K., & Lindholm, L. (2020). Towards capability-adjusted life years in public health and social welfare : Results from a Swedish survey on ranking capabilities. PLoS ONE, 15(12), Article e0242699. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242699
