Effect of odourised enrichment on pig behaviour – data from part 2 of project ”Smell this"
https://doi.org/10.5878/z57e-3j96
This experiment tested whether odorised straw could enhance straw engagement and improve welfare on a commercial farm. It involved 1 600 pigs, from 10 weeks of age to slaughter, housed in pens of approx. 10 littermates. Eighty pens were assigned to one of four treatments: Odorised straw provided in a rack with odour changing 1) weekly or 2) every weekday, or non-odorised straw 3) in a rack or 4) on the floor (empty rack). The remaining 80 pens served as controls (straw provided on the floor, no rack). Odorised treatments were essential oils (lavender, aniseed, ginger, thyme, and pine), and the odourless treatment was mineral oil. Clinical welfare scores (tail damage, ear damage, body soiling) were scored weekly, and behaviour was recorded (weeks 5, 7, and 9). Data collection included straw engagement duration, relative interaction with straw and pen inventory, play (locomotor, social, straw-related), and rubbing and rolling.
Clinical welfare scores
The clinical welfare scores were assessed for all treatment pens and the non-treated pens. This was done by five experienced observers who were not blind to the treatments, or the odours. During the weekly assessments, the experimental staff went through all pig rooms and scored the clinical welfare scores for pigs in both treatment and non-treated pens. All individuals were scored on all three clinical welfare scores: ear damage, tail damage, and body soiling.
Behavioural observations
Behavioural observations were done for all video recorded pens i.e., treatment pens only. All behavioural observations were done by one (straw engagement duration and relative interactions with straw and inventory) or two (play behaviour) experienced observers, who were aware of the experimental procedures but to specific odour/odourless treatment (apart from straw in rack vs on floor).
Due to unforeseen issues with hard drives and the electricity at the farm, some recordings were lost, and the behavioural observations were conducted on the remaining 75% of recordings. Experimental weeks 5, 7, and 9 were chosen for behavioural observations to avoid the beginning (when pigs were acclimatising) as well as the end of the finishing period (to ensure none of the experimental pigs were sent to slaughter), while also ensuring behavioural data spread across the experimental period. Within these weeks, Monday to Friday were chosen for observation i.e., the days where treatments were applied.
Straw engagement duration was an event-based measure. Using the video recordings of the selected pens, the exact time of straw provision was found for each pen. This point in time was used as a starting point when calculating the straw engagement duration per day. The time of straw provision, regardless of whether in rack or on the floor, was noted and the latency until the last pig stopped engaging with straw (i.e., when the pig started doing another behaviour, lying down or drinking) was recorded. Pigs being engaged with the straw was defined as either: ‘engaging with straw in rack’ or ‘engaging with straw on the floor’.
Relative straw and inventory interaction time was a relative time use of resources within the pig pen. This measure was recorded during a fixed focus hour 10:00-11:00 within the normal straw-provision routine. On a few occasions, the chosen pen had not yet received straw (18 out of 298, 1-hour videos), and these were not included in the analysis. Behaviour was extracted from the video recordings, using the ethogram in the affiliated publication. Behaviour sampling was carried out at pen level, and the sum per week of all individuals in a pen performing each of the behaviours was calculated (duration in seconds).
Play behaviour was also observed during the fixed focus hour (10:00-11:00) using the footage. Play behaviour was recorded as frequency and duration of each behaviour using the ethogram (see affiliated publication).
Please see the affiliated publication for the full statistical details, and the readme file for variable descriptions.
For more information about the overarching project please see: https://www.slu.se/en/research/research-catalogue/projekt/l/smell-this---improving-enrichment-materials-for-pigs-using-odours
Download 5 files with open access (393.08 KiB)
Files with open access (5)
Files with open access (5)
Citation and access
Citation and access
Access level:
Creator/Principal investigator(s):
- Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet – Institutionen för biosystem och teknologi
Research principal:
Principal's reference number:
- SLU.ltv.2026.4.2.IÄ-6
Data contains personal data:
Yes
Type of personal data:
Pseudonymised observer information
Code key exists:
Yes
Citation:
Language:
Data collection - Observation
Data collection - Observation
Mode of collection:
Observation
Time period(s) for data collection:
2023-02 - 2023-12
Data collector:
- Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
Öppnar nytt fönster hos ror.org.
ROR
Administrative information
Administrative information
Responsible department/unit:
Department of Biosystems and Technology
Contributor(s):
- Heta Rautiainen – Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet
Ethical Review
Ethical Review
Reviewer:
- Etikprövningsmyndigheten
components.catalogue.resource.content.administrativeInformation.ethicalReview.rorId.srText
ROR
Registration number:
5.8.18-00862/2023
Ethical review information:
The experiment was reviewed and approved by the Swedish Board of Agriculture’s Uppsala Ethics Committee on Animal Research (ethics approval number Dnr. 5.8.18-00862/2023), in compliance with Directive of the European Community 86/609/EEC.
Funding
Funding
Funding agency:
Award number:
2020-01286
Award title:
Lukta på det här! - Berikning av grisars miljö med hjälp av lukter
Funding information:
Grisar biter, bökar och luktar när de samlar information om sin omgivning. Det kallas för utforskande beteende, vilket grisar har hög motivation till att utföra. För att möta grisarnas behov att utforska sin omgivning ger grisproducenter sina grisar berikningsmaterial. Enligt svensk lag måste berikningsmaterialet vara ett strömedel, oftast används halm.I snitt får en gris cirka 50 gram halm per dag i kommersiell produktion. Trots detta är motivationsbehovet ofta inte tillfredsställt. Det kan resultera i att grisarna riktar sitt utforskande beteende mot de andra grisarna i boxen, så kallat omriktat beteende. Detta kan få förödande konsekvenser för både djurvälfärd och gårdens ekonomi. Den mest skadliga formen av omriktat beteende är svansbitning, vilket uppstår när en gris biter i en annan gris svans. Svansbitning är en av de största utmaningarna inom modern grisproduktion. Ett sätt att minska risken för omriktat eller skadligt beteende, såsom svansbitning, kan vara att förbättra berikningsmaterialets kvalitet.Att grisar används för att leta tryffel är välkänt och många menar att grisar har en välutvecklad förmåga att känna dofter. Trots det har grisars luktsinne fått väldigt lite vetenskaplig uppmärksamhet och betydelsen av grisarnas luktsinne har inte heller beaktats vid valet av berikningsmaterial. I det här projektet vill vi studera vilken potential dofter har för att förbättra nuvarande berikningsstrategier i modern grisproduktion, i syfte att förbättra djurens välfärd.Vi planerar att genomföra flera tester för att avgöra vilka dofter som grisar kan upptäcka och särskilja, samt vilka dofter som grisar är mest intresserade av att undersöka. Vi kommer också genomföra ett gårdsförsök för att jämföra beteendet mellan grisar med doftberikad halm och grisar med enbart obehandlad halm i produktionsmiljö.Den föreslagna studien har direkt koppling till FNs hållbarhetsmål, primärt mål 2 och 3, och ar även kopplingar till samhällsintressen som: 1) förbättrad djurvälfärd, 2) ökad hållbarhet i jordbrukssektorn (grisproduktion) samt 3) generera ny kunskap om en av våra vanligast förekommande domesticerade djurarter.
Topic and keywords
Topic and keywords
Swedish Standard Classification of Research Subjects 2025:
Relations
Relations
Website:
Related research data:
Publications
Publications
Citation:
Rørvang, M.V., et al. in press. Olfactory enrichment – effects of odorised straw on exploratory behaviour, straw engagement and play in finishing pigs. Animal.
