Association between guidelines and medical practitioners’ perception of best management for patients attending with an apparently uncomplicated acute sore throat: A cross-sectional survey in five countries

Ronny Gunnarsson

doi:10.5878/45kw-6408

Association between guidelines and medical practitioners’ perception of best management for patients attending with an apparently uncomplicated acute sore throat: A cross-sectional survey in five countries

https://doi.org/10.5878/45kw-6408

The aim was to investigate the relationship between guidelines and the medical practitioners’ perception of optimal care for patients attending with an apparently uncomplicated acute sore throat in five countries (Australia, Germany, Sweden, UK and USA). Raw data are uploaded as an SPSS file as well as .csv. Descriptive labels and descriptions of values are found within the data file and in the PDF documentation. A scanned survey sheet is also provided along with notes on how it was coded at data entry.

Download 4 files (531.08 KiB)

Data files

Citation and access

Method and outcome

Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire

Geographic coverage

Administrative information

Topic and keywords

Publications

Metadata

Version 1

University of Gothenburg

Association between guidelines and medical practitioners’ perception of best management for patients attending with an apparently uncomplicated acute sore throat: A cross-sectional survey in five countries

Data files

Citation and access

Creator/Principal investigator(s):

Research principal:

Data contains personal data:

Citation:

Data access level:

Language:

Method and outcome

Unit of analysis:

Population:

Study design:

Sampling procedure:

Time period(s) investigated:

Variables:

Number of individuals/objects:

Data format/data structure:

Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire

Mode of collection:

Time period(s) for data collection:

Data collector:

Source of the data:

Geographic coverage

Geographic location:

Lowest geographic unit:

Highest geographic unit:

Administrative information

Responsible department/unit:

Ethics Review 1:

Ethics Review 2:

Ethics Review 3:

Ethics Review 4:

Ethics Review 5:

Funding

Funding agency:

Award number:

Topic and keywords

Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2025:

Keywords:

Publications

Citation:

DOI:

Metadata