Maasai Household and Village Socioeconomic Status and Decisions in Ngorongoro - Maasai women and men survey, and village-level information
Documentation files
Documentation files
Citation and access
Citation and access
Data access level:
Creator/Principal investigator(s):
Research principal:
Principal's reference number:
- MS-394
Data contains personal data:
Yes
Type of personal data:
Indirect identifiers: municipality, ward, income, number of family members, amount of cattle
Citation:
Language:
Method and outcome
Method and outcome
Unit of analysis:
Population:
Maasai households living in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area
Time method:
Sampling procedure:
Description of sampling:
Village Assessment. A portion of the research team, the “village assessment” team, conducted semi-structured interviews and data collection in a specific village on the first of a two-day survey approach. This team met with the village head, members of the village council as available, a woman, a Maasai youth when available, and representatives from the health and school facilities to gain village-specific information. The village assessment included obtaining the list of households eligible for subsidized grain. The team then used that list as a sampling frame to generate a systematic random sample stratified by sub-village to select survey respondents. With a target of 20 interviews per village, the number of households surveyed per sub-village was determined based on the proportion of village households in each sub-village based on the number of households on the grain distribution list. To select households from the grain list, we divided the total number of subvillage households by the number of households to be surveyed and rounded down to get a new number, X. Each village leader was asked to select a random number, Y, between 1 and X. The team then selected the Yth household as a starting point on the list and sampled every Xth household from there until the end of the list was reached. In the above case, the village leader was asked to pick a number between 1 and 43 for Sub-village A and between 1 and 45 for Sub-village B. After the selection of households, we consulted with the village leader whether each woman on the list was expected to be home on the following day. If the woman was known to be traveling (e.g. at a regional market), we then asked about the ID-1 (ID number minus 1) household. If that person was not home, we then asked about the ID+1 household, then ID-2, and then ID+2 households. Both ID numbers and names were recorded for every person to be interviewed. Additionally, of all the women sampled in a village, a subset of 3-4 husbands of these women was then chosen to answer a men’s survey. The aim of the men’s survey was to serve as a comparison to the women’s survey. The village assessment team provided the enumeration team with the households to be surveyed and the information collected in the village assessment in the evening following the assessment and prior to the survey administration. Survey administration. On the second day of data collection in each particular village, the team of enumerators divided the list of survey respondents among the enumerators. The protocol stated that if the enumerator arrived at someone's house and found no one home, they went to the nearest neighbor and interviewed them instead. If this person happened to be a co-wife of the original person that was supposed to be interviewed, that information was recorded in the survey.
Time period(s) investigated:
Variables:
2036
Number of individuals/objects:
458
Data format/data structure:
Data collection - Face-to-face interview
Data collection - Face-to-face interview
Mode of collection:
Face-to-face interview
Description of the mode of collection:
The data were collected through ODK Collect on Samsung tablets. The data were downloaded from the server, de-identified as per our IRB approved protocol, and shared on a restricted-access Google Team Drive.
Time period(s) for data collection:
2018-07-20 - 2018-07-28
Number of responses:
458
Source of the data:
- Registers/Records/Accounts: Economic/Financial
- Registers/Records/Accounts: Personal
- Population group
- Registers/Records/Accounts
Instrument
Instrument
Name:
Tablet
Type:
Technical instrument(s)
Description of the instrument:
Samsung tablets for data collection using ODK Collect software
Geographic coverage
Geographic coverage
Geographic location:
Geographic description:
The study was conducted within the population that lives in the Ngorongoro Conservation Area (NCA). The NCA is a Protected Area and a Mixed World Heritage Site in Northern Tanzania, covering 8,292 square kilometers. It is located 180km West of Arusha in the Crater Highlands area of Tanzania, extending from the plains of Serengeti National Park and Maswa Game Reserve in the West, to the Eastern arm of the Great Rift Valley.
Lowest geographic unit:
Parish
Highest geographic unit:
Municipality
Administrative information
Administrative information
Responsible department/unit:
Environment for Development, School of Business Economics and Law
Funding
Funding
Funding agency:
- Environment for Development Initiative
Funding agency:
- Sida (The Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency)
Award number:
MS-394
Topic and keywords
Topic and keywords
CESSDA Topic Classification:
Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2025:
Metadata
Metadata
