Choose your collaborators wisely: Addressing interdependent tasks through collaboration in responding to wildfire disasters

Örjan Bodin

doi:10.5878/rs9k-j516

Choose your collaborators wisely: Addressing interdependent tasks through collaboration in responding to wildfire disasters

https://doi.org/10.5878/rs9k-j516

The study applies a network-centric method to investigate wildfire responder networks in Canada and Sweden. It investigates actor collaboration when addressing interdependent tasks, and assesses how certain network structures of actors-and-tasks relationships influence task effectiveness. The published article describes the data in-depth. The data consists of collaborative relationships between the actors that participated in the wildfire responses, and the actors' assessments of their own effectiveness in addressing their tasks. The data has been analysed in order to evaluate if and how the collaborative relationships have effected the actors' effectiveness in addressing their tasks. The method is thoroughly described in the article. An R script made available together with the data files also described the analyses.

Download 2 files (414.96 KiB)

Data files

Documentation files

Citation and access

Method and outcome

Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire

Geographic coverage

Administrative information

Topic and keywords

Publications

Metadata

Version 1

Stockholm University

Choose your collaborators wisely: Addressing interdependent tasks through collaboration in responding to wildfire disasters

Data files

Documentation files

Citation and access

Creator/Principal investigator(s):

Research principal:

Data contains personal data:

Citation:

Data access level:

License:

Language:

Method and outcome

Unit of analysis:

Population:

Time method:

Sampling procedure:

Description of sampling:

Time period(s) investigated:

Number of individuals/objects:

Response rate/participation rate:

Data format/data structure:

Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire

Mode of collection:

Description of the mode of collection:

Time period(s) for data collection:

Sample size:

Number of responses:

Non response size:

Source of the data:

Cause of non response

Reason:

Size:

Geographic coverage

Geographic location:

Geographic description:

Lowest geographic unit:

Highest geographic unit:

Administrative information

Responsible department/unit:

Contributor(s):

Commissioning organisation:

Funding

Funding agency:

Topic and keywords

CESSDA Topic Classification:

Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2011:

Keywords:

Publications

Citation:

DOI:

Metadata