Survey principles for responsibility distribution
Citation and access
Citation and access
Data access level:
Creator/Principal investigator(s):
Research principal:
Data contains personal data:
No
Citation:
Language:
Method and outcome
Method and outcome
Unit of analysis:
Population:
Vuxna invånare i sex svenska kommuner
Time method:
Sampling procedure:
Description of sampling:
Randomly selected individuals over the age of 17 in six municipalities in southern and western Sweden. The random selection was made by SPAR.
Time period(s) investigated:
Variables:
18
Number of individuals/objects:
510
Response rate/participation rate:
8.5%
Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
Mode of collection:
Self-administered questionnaire: Paper
Description of the mode of collection:
Invitation via postcard. Questionnaire on SUNET Survey. The questions were formulated in Swedish. The response options for the main question were presented on a five-point Likert scale.
Time period(s) for data collection:
2020-12-01 - 2021-03-31
Data collector:
- Lund University
Opens a new window at ror.org.
ROROpens in a new tab
Sample size:
6000
Number of responses:
510
Non response size:
5490
Source of the data:
- Geographic area
Cause of non response
Cause of non response
Reason:
Size:
Geographic coverage
Geographic coverage
Geographic location:
Lowest geographic unit:
Municipality
Highest geographic unit:
County (NUTS 3)
Administrative information
Administrative information
Responsible department/unit:
Department of Political Science
Other research principals:
Ethics Review:
Swedish Ethical Review Authority - 2019-06124
Approval for the survey was granted by the Swedish Ethical Review Authority, Etikprövningsmyndigheten (protocol code 2019–06124)
Funding
Funding
Funding agency:
Award number:
2018-00211_Formas
Award title:
Sustainable Distribution of Responsibility for Climate Change Adaptation
Funding information:
Climate change adaptation needs some distribution of responsibility, for example between public and private actors. To gain legitimacy for adaptation decisions, the distribution of responsibility needs to be grounded in theories of just distribution and what those affected by decisions see as just. The purpose of this project is to contribute to a sustainable spatial planning and the ability of public authorities, especially municipalities and County Administrative Boards (CABs), to make well-informed and sustainable adaptation decisions, based on knowledge about both climate change impacts and the perceptions of residents and civil servants on what constitutes a sustainable distribution of responsibility. Our aims are:A better understanding of the practical implications of theories about just distribution of responsibility for the choice of climate adaptation measures locally and regionally.Knowledge about what residents and civil servants consider a sustainable distribution of responsibility for climate adaptation measures.A better understanding of conflicts concerning the distribution of responsibilities and systematic knowledge about the possibilities to manage them.We study six municipalities and their residents, and two CABs, using mixed-methods: value theory, document studies, interviews, focus groups and surveys. Aim (1) and (3) will generate knowledge, applicable to a wider set of geographical areas and sustainable spatial planning issues.
Funding agency:
Award number:
2022-01859_Formas
Award title:
Responsibility for Climate Adaptation Across Political Levels, Sectors and Public-Private Boundaries - ReClAd
Funding information:
Responsibility for climate adaptation needs to be distributed across political levels, sectors and public-private boundaries in order to be effective. To gain legitimacy for such a distribution, it needs to be grounded in ethically defendable theories of just distribution and in what those affected by decisions see as legitimate. The project objective is to contribute to a sustainable Swedish climate adaptation, with a just and legitimate distribution of responsibility across political levels, sectors, and public-private boundaries. The goals are:G1. Knowledge about what individuals consider a legitimate distribution of responsibility for climate adaptation.G2. Knowledge about what public actors consider a legitimate distribution of responsibility for climate adaptation.G3. Improved understanding of the implications of theories of just distribution of responsibility for cross-cutting climate adaptation, and of how to adapt and implement the theories in this context.G4. A better understanding of how to establish a cross-cutting sustainable distribution of responsibilities.The project will use a survey and focus groups to reach G1, interviews with municipalities, national agencies and sector organisations to reach G2, and ethical and value theoretical analysis to reach G3. G4 will be reached by combining the knowledge and understanding reached in G1-G3 and by a systematic analysis of how conflicts over responsibility can be managed.
Topic and keywords
Topic and keywords
Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2025:
CESSDA Topic Classification:
Publications
Publications
Citation:
Metadata
Metadata
