PercivedSafety2025
https://doi.org/10.5878/rseq-r241
Through analyses of questions used in existing perceived safety surveys, both strengths and weaknesses were identified, across four domains: trust, worry about victimization, behaviours related to worry about victimization, and perceived problem areas. Based on these findings, revised and supplementary survey items were developed and tested. This dataset contains responses to these survey items.
Data collection was conducted between September and November 2025 and managed by the external survey institute, the Institute for Quality Indicators (Indikator Opinion); one municipality survey and one national panel survey.
For the municipal survey, random samples were drawn from the Swedish population register. A total of 4,000 individuals aged 18–100 years were invited from four municipal areas (1,000 per area): Helsingborg South, Kungälv City, Stockholm Skarpnäck, and Tingsryd. The survey was distributed by post. Follow-up reminders were subsequently sent via Kivra (a secure Swedish digital mailbox service), renewed postal mailings, and SMS messages to individuals with registered mobile phone numbers. Respondents could choose to complete either a paper questionnaire or a web-based version using a personalized survey link.
In addition to the municipal survey, data were collected through the nationwide panel maintained by the Institute for Quality Indicators. The panel sample was designed both to increase national coverage and to improve demographic representation through targeted oversampling of younger respondents and individuals with a foreign background. Specifically, recruitment aimed to include at least 500 randomly selected respondents, 250 respondents aged 30 years or younger, and 250 respondents with a foreign background.
In total, the study comprises 2,727 respondents, with approximately equal numbers drawn from the municipal survey and the nationwide panel sample.
Download 3 files with open access (578.83 KiB)
Files with open access (3)
Files with open access (3)
Citation and access
Citation and access
Access level:
Creator/Principal investigator(s):
Research principal:
Principal's reference number:
- 3098-3.1.1-2024
Data contains personal data:
No
Citation:
Method and outcome
Method and outcome
Unit of analysis:
Population:
The study included a total of 2,727 respondents, of whom 1,387 participated in the municipal survey and 1,340 were recruited through the nationwide panel.
Among all respondents, 46% were men (n = 1,191) and 54% were women (n = 1,399). The overall mean age was 32 years (SD = 6.7).
The municipal survey consisted of respondents from four areas: Helsingborg South (17%), Kungälv City (29%), Stockholm, Skarpnäck (25%), and Tingsryd (29%).
Time method:
Sampling procedure:
Description of sampling:
For the municipal survey, random samples were drawn from the Swedish population register. A total of 4,000 individuals aged 18–100 years were invited from four municipal areas (1,000 per area): Helsingborg South, Kungälv City, Stockholm Skarpnäck, and Tingsryd.
The panel sample recruitment aimed to include at least 500 randomly selected respondents, 250 respondents aged 30 years or younger, and 250 respondents with a foreign background.
Time period(s) investigated:
Variables:
57
Number of individuals/objects:
2727
Data format/data structure:
Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire
Data collection - Self-administered questionnaire
Mode of collection:
Self-administered questionnaire
Description of the mode of collection:
For the municipal survey, it was distributed by post. Follow-up reminders were subsequently sent via Kivra (a secure Swedish digital mailbox service), renewed postal mailings, and SMS messages to individuals with registered mobile phone numbers. Respondents could choose to complete either a paper questionnaire or a web-based version using a personalised survey link.
The panel sample come from the Institute for Quality Indicators.
Time period(s) for data collection:
2025-09 - 2025-11
Data collector:
- Institute for Quality Indicators (Sweden)
Opens a new window at ror.org.
ROR
Number of responses:
2727
Source of the data:
- Research data
Geographic coverage
Geographic coverage
Geographic location:
Lowest geographic unit:
Municipality
Highest geographic unit:
Country
Administrative information
Administrative information
Responsible department/unit:
School of Social Sciences
Ethical Review
Ethical Review
Reviewer:
- Swedish Ethical Review Authority
components.catalogue.resource.content.administrativeInformation.ethicalReview.rorId.srText
ROR
Registration number:
2025-05142-01
Funding
Funding
Funding agency:
- Stiftelsen Länsförsäkringsgruppens Forsknings & Utvecklingsfond
Award number:
P1.23
Award title:
Measuring to Know: A Study to Improve Measurement Quality in Percived Safety Surveys
Topic and keywords
Topic and keywords
Swedish Standard Classification of Research Subjects 2025:
Metadata
Metadata
Version 1

Södertörn University