Quality of Research Practice: Face validity questionnaire responses
https://doi.org/10.5878/003019
There are few acknowledged quality standards for research practice and evaluation, even though universities are increasingly judged on research impact. This dataset contains questionnaire responses from 42 senior researchers working (within 18 different departments) at three major universities in Sweden about the importance of 32 defined criteria based on four main areas (credible, contributory, communicable, and conforming) describing indicators of research practice quality.
Data files
Data files
Documentation files
Documentation files
Citation and access
Citation and access
Data access level:
Creator/Principal investigator(s):
- Emelie Fröberg - Stockholm School of Economics - Department of Economics
- Uno Fors - Stockholm University
- Udo Zander - Handelshögskolan i Stockholm
- Gunnar H Nilsson - Karolinska Institutet
- Pär Mårtensson - Handelshögskolan i Stockholm
Research principal:
Citation:
Language:
Method and outcome
Method and outcome
Unit of analysis:
Sampling procedure:
Number of individuals/objects:
42
Data format/data structure:
Geographic coverage
Geographic coverage
Geographic location:
Topic and keywords
Topic and keywords
Standard för svensk indelning av forskningsämnen 2025:
Keywords:
Publications
Publications
Citation:
Pär Mårtensson, Uno Fors, Sven-Bertil Wallin, Udo Zander, Gunnar H Nilsson,
Evaluating research: A multidisciplinary approach to assessing research practice and quality,
Research Policy,
Volume 45, Issue 3,
2016,
Pages 593-603,
ISSN 0048-7333,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.009Opens in a new tab.
(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048733315001845Opens in a new tab)
Keywords: Research practice; Research quality; Research evaluation; Multidisciplinary; Concept model; Rigour; Relevance
Metadata
Metadata
Version 1.0

Handelshögskolan i Stockholm